Firm asks justices to overturn insurance ruling
Florida Supreme Court, Insurance Regulation News, property insurance, assignment of benefits
Radey is an AV-rated firm consisting of lawyers who practice before state agencies and in all state and federal courts.
Florida Supreme Court, Insurance Regulation News, property insurance, assignment of benefits
Office of Insurance Regulation, Florida Legislature, Insurance Regulation News, assignment of benefits, David Altmaier, AOB
Florida Legislature, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Insurance Regulation News, assignment of benefits, Senate Banking and Insurance Committee, AOB Claims
Florida Legislature, assignment of benefits, uninsured motorist coverage, Insurance Regulation News, PIP, auto insurance
AOB, David Altmaier, assignment of benefits, Florida Insurance Commissioner, property insurance, Insurance Regulation News, Florida Legislature
Radey wishes all of our friends a happy and prosperous new year. As 2019 begins, Florida’s capital city will be embarking on a new era. Governor-elect Ron DeSantis will take office next week, succeeding Rick Scott who was Governor for eight years. Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis returns, having been elected to the Cabinet office to […]
Florida’s 4th District Court of Appeal in Restoration 1 of Port St. Lucie v. Ark Royal Insurance Company determined that an insurer may require approval of all insureds and the mortgagee before an assignment of benefits is valid. This ruling differs from a conclusion reached by the 5th DCA last year after the Office of […]
Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, AOB Claims, assignment of benefits, property insurance, Insurance Regulation News
assignment of benefits, property insurance, Florida Legislature, hurricane season
Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal has upheld the ability of a policyholder to make multiple assignments under a homeowners insurance policy. Nicon Construction v. Homeowners Choice Property and Casualty Insurance Company involved a policyholder’s issuing assignments of benefits to two separate vendors. The insurer argued that upon the policyholder’s assigning the policy rights to […]