Headlines

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday she and the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives are open to a health care overhaul without a government-run public option, a strong signal Congress could agree on a plan early next year.The House last month passed a health care bill that included the kind of public option President Barack Obama and party liberals have long sought, but at which the Senate has balked. A final Senate vote on the health care package could occur on Dec. 23 or 24.

The White House and Senate leaders continued to push Wednesday for the 60 votes needed to cut off debate, and were thought to be one short. The apparent holdout, Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson, met privately with Obama in the Oval Office Tuesday for about half an hour.

Nelson, who wants more restrictive abortion language and has other concerns, still wouldn’t commit to backing the bill.

Meanwhile, with the Senate mired in procedural knots, two developments behind the scenes were driving the process:

– One was spreading the message that “bare bones” legislation could be passed, as Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., put it, and improved in future years.

– The other sticking point remains abortion, the focus of private conversations throughout the Capitol.

If the Senate measure eventually passes, Senate and House leaders would negotiate a compromise, which then would be subject to votes in both chambers.

While the closed-door negotiations, which are expected to involve top White House officials, are still expected to be tense – several key points of disagreement remain – Pelosi told reporters Wednesday she was confident those obstacles could be overcome.

Asked if she could support a bill that didn’t have the public option, Pelosi said, “It depends on what else is in the bill.”

Her attitude is similar to that of many others who have pushed a public option. The mantra now among top Democrats is to find areas of agreement on health care, put them in the bill, declare victory and work in the months and years ahead to fashion something broader.

“This is about a framework,” added Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., “a fundamental framework that will drive the debate.

“This reform effort will never really end,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La.

Pelosi urged looking at the areas of House-Senate agreement, such as barring insurers from charging consumers more or cutting off coverage because of pre-existing conditions, or requiring nearly everyone to obtain coverage.

“It isn’t just about health care. It’s about a healthier America,” Pelosi said.

After Obama met with Senate Democrats Tuesday, Nelson stuck around and met privately with the president – their third such session in about a week. They reportedly didn’t engage in negotiations, but Nelson said Obama talked about “the consequences of not taking action.”

Talk was that most of the seven Senate Democrats who last week voted for tough restrictions on federal abortion funding wanted similar language in the health care bill.

Nelson has been in close touch with Nebraska anti-abortion groups about the issue, and was in contact with several moderate senators Wednesday, notably Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa., who’s trying to iron out abortion language the seven Democrats can accept.

Nelson also had other concerns, notably about the bill’s excise tax on more expensive policies, Medicare reimbursement to nursing homes and other issues.

An abortion compromise probably would be part of a huge amendment to the bill that included not only abortion, but also other changes.

Among them: Having the federal Office of Personnel Management oversee national health care plans that would compete with the private sector. No details were yet available.

In the House, Pelosi couldn’t say if she supported the idea. But she seemed open, saying, “The emphasis was not on public. The emphasis was on option.”